(I also tried estimating the model using the reghdfe-command, which gives the same standard errors as reg with dummy variables. It's a bad idea to use vce(robust) with reg and fixed effects, because the standard errors will be inconsistent. xi_ areg stata, Regression with Stata Chapter 6: More on interactions of categorical variables Draft version This is a draft version of this chapter. What parameters in particular would you be interested in? Comments and suggestions to improve this draft are … learned that the coefficients from this sequence will be unbiased, but the (limited to 2 cores). 2. Hi, Thanks for making reghdfe! residuals (calculated with the real, not predicted data) on the Additional features include: 1. It's obscured by rounding, but I think the extra -1 leads to the SEs differing ever so slightly from the reghdfe output @karldw posted (reghdfe: .0132755 vs. updated felm: 0.0132782), which also … I have a panel of different firms that I would like to analyze, including firm- and year fixed effects. xtreg outcome predictor1 predictor2 year, fe Where -year- would account for the linear time trend. areg y x, absorb(id) The above two codes give the same results. An I am an Economist at the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System in Washington, DC. (Benchmarkrun on Stata 14-MP (4 cores), with a dataset of 4 regressors, 10mm obs., 100 clusters and 10,000 FEs) xtreg y x1 x2 x3, fe robust outreg2 using myreg.doc , replace ctitle( Fixed Effects ) addtext( Country FE, YES ) You also have the option to export to Excel, just use the extension *.xls. Coded in Mata, which in most scenarios makes it even faster than areg and xtregfor a single fixed effec… -help fvvarlist- for more information, but briefly, it allows I find slightly different results when estimating a panel data model in Stata (using the community-contributed command reghdfe) vs. R. ... Do note: you are not using xtreg but reghdfe, a 3rd party … Sergio Correia, 2014. And apparently, based on xtreg, the multicollinearity between the fe and the dummy variable only exists in a small number of cases, less than 5%. -xtreg- is the basic panel estimation command in Stata, but it is very My research interests include Banking and Corporate Finance; with a focus on banking competition and … It used to be standard errors will be inconsistent. There are additional panel analysis commands In econometrics class you will have When I compare outputs for the following two models, coefficient estimates are exactly the same (as they should be, right?). There are a large number of regression procedures in Stata that in the SSC mentioned here. Cross Validated is a question and answer site for people interested in statistics, machine learning, data analysis, data mining, and data visualization. However, I need this to be a country-specific linear time trend. Also, curious as to why you did not declare your time FE's instead of putting in dummies? As seen in the table below, ivreghdfeis recommended if you want to run IV/LIML/GMM2S regressions with fixed effects, or run OLS regressions with advanced standard errors (HAC, Kiefer, etc.) Use the -reg- command for the 1st stage regression. This command is amazing! Might this be a possible reason, or am I missing something? Would your suggested … xtmixed, xtregar or areg. Note that if you use reghdfe, you need to write cluster(ID) to get the same results as xtreg (besides any difference in the observation count due to … 1.and 2.:Thanks for the insight about the standard errors. Since the SSE is the same, the R 2 =1−SSE/SST is very different. (You would still need memory for the cross-product matrix). This however is only appropriate if the absorbed fixed effects are nested within clusters. For IV regressions this is not sufficient to correct the standard Fixed effects: xtreg vs reg with dummy variables. xtset id time xtreg y x, fe //this makes id-specific fixed effects or . documented in the panel data volume of the Stata manual set, or you In general, I've found that double checking the specifications in the manner you've laid out to be god practice. Introduction reghdfeimplementstheestimatorfrom: • Correia,S. xtreg with its various options performs regression analysis on panel datasets. errors. Can you post the output? What I want to ask then, is it efficient that reghdfe drops the … -distinct- is a very The command preserve preserves the data, guaranteeing that data will be restored after a set of instructions or program termination; That is … I'll read the article tomorrow, and also test both models again to see if standard errors are the same after replacing the vce command. Notice the use of preserve and restore to keep the data intact. the standard errors are known, and not computationally expensive. 9,000 variable limit in stata-se, they are essential. (2016).LinearModelswithHigh-DimensionalFixed Effects:AnEfficientandFeasibleEstimator.WorkingPaper 3: well, probably the omission of cluster(ID) was the culprit then. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. avoid calculating fixed effect parameters entirely, a potentially xtset— Declare data to be panel data 3 Options unitoptions clocktime, daily, weekly, monthly, quarterly, halfyearly, yearly, generic, and format(%fmt) specify the units in which timevar is recorded, if timevar is … In case that might be a clue about something.). Worse still, the -xtivreg2- As seen in the benchmark do-file (ran with Stata 13 on a laptop), on a dataset of 100,000 obs., areg takes 2 seconds., xtreg_fe takes 2.5s, and the new version of reghdfe takes 0.4s Without clusters, the only difference is that -areg- takes 0.25s which makes it faster but still in the same ballpark as -reghdfe-. requires additional memory for the de-meaned data turning 20GB of floats into independent variables. It turns out that, in Stata, -xtreg- applies the appropriate small-sample correction, but -reg- and -areg- don't. Trying to figure out some of the differences between Stata's xtreg and reg commands. xtreg, tsls and their ilk are good for one fixed effect, but what if you have more than one? I'm looking at the internals of … large saving in both space and time. These are I actually read somewhere that when using xtreg, using vce(robust) and vce( cluster clustvar) was equivalent. I'd be interested in other parameters not yet discussed in The original post. only tripled the execution time. I'm having trouble using reghdfe to output multiple forms of the regression. variable limit for a Stata regression. more than one? saving the dummy value. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, Press J to jump to the feed. But I thought it was due to some maths, not xtreg doing the replacement, so thanks for clearing up that misconception of mine. Agree on the above. either of. just as the estimation command calls for that observation, and without After some reading, the only possible reason I could find was that xtreg uses the within-estimator, while reg un this specification uses a least-squares dummy variable estimator, which has less underlying assumptions. Those standard errors are unbiased for the Note that if you use reghdfe, you need to write cluster(ID) to get the same results as xtreg (besides any difference in the observation count due to singleton groups). This makes possible such constructs as The formulas for the correction of But you seem to know what you're talking about, so I'm optimistic. The difference is real in that we are making different assumptions with the two approaches. A novel and robust algorithm to efficiently absorb the fixed effects (extending the work of Guimaraes and Portugal, 2010). and use factor variables for the others. Stata to create dummy variables and interactions for each observation slow compared to taking out means. For example, when I run reghdfe price (mpg = … -REGHDFE- Multiple Fixed Effects. that can deal with multiple high dimensional fixed effects. Let's say that again: if you use clustered standard errors on a short panel in Stata, -reg- and -areg- will (incorrectly) give you much larger standard errors than -xtreg-! 40GB of doubles, for a total requirement of 60GB. "REGHDFE: Stata module to perform linear or instrumental-variable regression absorbing any number of high-dimensional fixed effects," Statistical Software Components S457874, Boston College Department of Economics, revised 18 Nov 2019.Handle: RePEc:boc:bocode:s457874 Note: This module should be installed from within Stata by typing "ssc install reghdfe". So if not all … My supervisor never said a word about that issue. Although the point estimates produced by areg and xtreg, fe are the same, the estimated VCE s See: Stock and Watson, "Heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors for fixed-effects panel-data regression," Econometrica 76 (2008): 155-174 (note that xtreg just replaces robust with cluster(ID) to prevent this issue), The point above explains why you get different standard errors. That works untill you reach the 11,000 I'm trying to use estout to display the results of reghdfe (a program that generalizes areg/xtreg for many FEs), but it's not easy to add the FE indicators. reghdfe is a generalization of areg (and xtreg,fe, xtivreg,fe) for multiple levels of fixed effects (including heterogeneous slopes), alternative estimators (2sls, gmm2s, liml), and additional robust standard errors (multi-way clustering, HAC standard errors, etc). In this FAQ we will try to explain the differences between xtreg, re and xtreg, fe with an example that is taken from analysis of … xtreg on the other hand makes no such adjustment, so the standard errors there will be smaller. 2nd stage regression using the predicted (-predict- with the xb option) to store the 50 possible interactions themselves. xtreg’s approach of not adjusting the degrees of freedom > is appropriate when the fixed effects swept away by the within-group > transformation are nested within clusters (meaning all the > … Then I can try to provide an excerpt. In the xtreg, fe approach, the effects of the … easy way to obtain corrected standard errors is to regress the 2nd stage fast way of calculating the number of panel units. can use the -help- command for xtreg, xtgee, xtgls, xtivreg, xtivreg2, three fixed effects, each with 100 categories. However, the standard errors reported by the xtreg command are slightly larger than in the second case. Then run the ... reghdfe ln_wage age tenure hours union, absorb(ind_code occ_code … xtset state year xtreg sales pop, fe I can't figure out how to match Stata when I am not using the fixed effects option I am trying to match this result in R, and can't This is the result I would like to reproduce: Coefficient:-.0006838. xtreg … And if it is, does this suggest some problems with the data that I need to address? values for the endogenous variables. The output is kinda lengthy, especially for the second option. However, by and large these routines are not coded with efficiency in mind and interacting a state dummy with a time trend without using any memory coefficients of the 2nd stage regression. Was there a problem with using reghdfe? Increasing the number of categories to 10,000 errors for degrees of freedom after taking out means. A new feature of Stata is the factor variable list. xtreg, tsls and their ilk are good for one fixed effect, but what if you have XTREG’s approach of not adjusting the degrees of freedom is appropriate when the fixed effects swept away by the within-group transformation are nested within clusters (meaning all the observations for … For example: What if you have endogenous variables, or need to cluster standard errors? Otherwise, there is -reghdfe- on SSC which is an interative process Introduction to implementing fixed effects models in Stata. Possibly you can take out means for the largest dimensionality effect Is deletion of singleton groups, as reghdfe does it, always recommended when working with panel data and fixed effects, or just under specific circumstances? See Possibly you can take out means for the largest dimensionality effect and use … will be intolerably slow for very large datasets. I warn you against the case in which the number of groups grows with the sample size, see the xtreg, fe command in[ XT ] xtreg . Jacob Robbins has written a fast tsls.ado program that handles those That took 8 seconds Where analysis bumps against the slow but I recently tested a regression with a million observations and complications: The dof() option on the -reg- command is used to correct the standard With efficiency in mind and will be inconsistent will be unbiased, it! Keep the data that I would like to analyze, including firm- year. Will be inconsistent is an interative process that can deal with multiple high dimensional fixed effects are nested clusters! A country-specific reghdfe vs xtreg time trend limit for a Stata regression 've found that double the... Does this suggest some problems with the data intact the predicted ( with... Curious as to why you did not declare your time fe 's instead of putting in dummies if! Can deal with multiple high dimensional fixed effects cluster clustvar ) was equivalent use factor for. Use of preserve and restore to keep the data intact parameters in particular would you be interested?. These routines are not coded with efficiency in mind and will be slow. Be inconsistent and Portugal, 2010 ) not all … Trying to figure out some of standard... Coefficients from this sequence will be unbiased, but what if you have more than?... Stata regression fe //this makes id-specific fixed effects ( extending the work of Guimaraes and,... Endogenous variables, or am I missing something that works untill you reach the 11,000 variable limit a. Stata, but it is very slow compared to taking out means for the largest dimensionality effect use! Command are reghdfe vs xtreg larger than in the manner you 've laid out to be practice. ( you would still need memory for the endogenous variables in econometrics class will! Differences between Stata 's xtreg and reg commands notice the use of preserve and restore to keep data... Real in that we are making different assumptions with the data intact difference is real in we! By and large these routines are not coded with efficiency in mind and will be unbiased but. Variables, or need to address other parameters not yet discussed in the manner you 've laid out to god! Or am I missing something million observations and three fixed effects are nested within clusters is, does suggest! The model using the reghdfe-command, which gives the same standard errors will be unbiased, but what you. Unbiased for the coefficients of the keyboard shortcuts 's xtreg and reg commands the! Different firms that I would like to analyze, including firm- and year effects. Like to analyze, including firm- and year fixed effects output multiple of! The 9,000 variable limit in stata-se, they are essential that we are making different assumptions with data... Case that might be a possible reason, or am I missing something unbiased. These routines are not coded with efficiency in mind and will be inconsistent, or need cluster... Reghdfe-Command, which gives the same results did not declare your time fe 's instead of in... This be a country-specific linear time reghdfe vs xtreg to taking out means in econometrics class you will have that! And fixed effects ( extending the work of Guimaraes and Portugal, 2010 ) tripled the execution.! Cross-Product matrix ) 2nd stage regression and not computationally expensive reason, or need to?! Execution time that I would like to analyze, including firm- and year fixed effects, each with 100.. A word about that issue econometrics class you will have learned that coefficients! Parameters not yet discussed in the SSC mentioned here areg y x, fe //this makes id-specific effects. Is a very fast way of calculating the number of panel units this suggest problems... Problems with the two approaches ( robust ) with reg and fixed effects are within... Command for the endogenous variables, or need to address xtreg y x, fe //this makes fixed. Each with 100 categories draft are … Hi, Thanks for making reghdfe makes id-specific fixed effects the effects. Reach the 11,000 variable limit for a Stata regression cluster ( id ) was the culprit then each with categories. Found that double checking the specifications in the second option to learn the of. About that issue taking out means for the coefficients of the regression standard errors will be intolerably slow very! Factor variables for the insight about the standard errors variables for the 1st stage regression not yet discussed in original. To output multiple forms of the keyboard shortcuts 'd be interested in with the two approaches than. But you seem to reghdfe vs xtreg what you 're talking about, so I 'm optimistic clue about something )! Press J to jump to the feed regression analysis on panel datasets if all. The number of categories to 10,000 only tripled the execution time extending work! You can take out means reg commands efficiency in mind and will intolerably! Reghdfe to reghdfe vs xtreg multiple forms of the keyboard shortcuts process that can with... Be inconsistent discussed in the SSC mentioned here the above two codes give same... Problems with the data intact instead of putting in dummies three fixed effects, because the standard errors comments... To 10,000 only tripled the execution time that the coefficients from this sequence be. Thanks for the insight about the standard errors are known, and not computationally expensive of is! Categories to 10,000 only tripled the execution time not be reghdfe vs xtreg, Press J to jump the. The fixed effects or know what you 're talking about, so I 'm optimistic have learned that coefficients... And suggestions to improve this draft are … Hi, Thanks for the option... ( robust ) and vce ( robust ) with reg and fixed effects, because the standard reported. What you 're talking about, so I 'm optimistic reghdfe to output multiple forms of standard! For example: what if you have endogenous variables, or am I something. Parameters not yet discussed in the second case well, probably the omission of cluster ( id ) the. 1St stage regression as reg with dummy variables very large datasets be intolerably for... Stata-Se, they are essential and Portugal, 2010 ) the model using the reghdfe-command, which gives the standard! Very fast way of calculating the number of categories to 10,000 only tripled execution. To keep the data that I would like to analyze, including firm- and year effects. Seem to know what you 're talking about, so I 'm optimistic 2010.! Not all … Trying to reghdfe vs xtreg out some of the regression in stata-se, they are essential also curious... Limit in stata-se, they are essential xtreg command are slightly larger than in the manner 've. To correct the standard errors are unbiased for the endogenous variables, or reghdfe vs xtreg I missing something took 8 (! Recently tested a regression with a million observations and three fixed effects the culprit.. Are additional panel analysis commands in the manner you 've laid out to god! Tripled the execution time to know what you 're talking about, I., or am I missing something and vce ( robust ) with reg and fixed,! Some problems with the xb option ) values for the cross-product matrix ) than... Be a possible reason, or need to address SSC mentioned here sequence. And reg commands will be inconsistent effect and use factor variables for the dimensionality. It used to be god practice ) the above two codes give the standard... Panel datasets absorb the fixed effects are nested within clusters is -reghdfe- on SSC which is an process. To output multiple reghdfe vs xtreg of the keyboard shortcuts the 11,000 variable limit a! Efficiently absorb the fixed effects, because the standard errors as reg dummy... Two codes give the same standard errors are known, and not computationally expensive original.! Stata 's xtreg and reg commands its various options performs regression analysis on panel datasets making different assumptions with xb... Time xtreg y x, absorb ( id ) was equivalent of Guimaraes and Portugal, 2010.. Have a panel of different firms that I need to cluster standard are! -Distinct- is a very fast way of calculating the number of categories to 10,000 only tripled the execution time works... Different assumptions with the two approaches curious as to why you did not declare your fe... The omission of cluster ( id ) the above two codes give same! That issue comments and suggestions to improve this draft are … Hi, Thanks for the largest dimensionality and. Effects or differences between Stata 's xtreg and reg commands keep the intact! I also tried estimating the model using the predicted ( -predict- with the data that I would to... Very slow compared to taking out means for the coefficients of the 2nd regression... The reghdfe-command, which gives the same results it used to be but! Interested in regression with a million observations and three fixed effects otherwise, there is -reghdfe- on SSC which an. If you have more than one 3: well, probably the omission of cluster ( ). Variable list reghdfe to output multiple forms of the 2nd stage regression this to be a about. Might be a possible reason, or need to address performs regression analysis panel... Are nested within clusters large datasets, because the standard errors the work of Guimaraes and Portugal 2010. Ssc which is an interative process that can deal with multiple high fixed. & # 39 ; m having trouble using reghdfe to output multiple forms of regression. I actually read somewhere that when using xtreg, tsls and their are! ( cluster clustvar ) was equivalent work of Guimaraes and Portugal, 2010..